SATs prep without the stress

Weekly personalised one to one tuition designed to build familiarity with KS2 SATs questions and techniques

View programme

KS2 SATs 2022: Maths Papers Question Breakdown

Originally published Monday 23rd May 2022

The KS2 SATs papers have been released, the SATs embargo cloud has cleared, and we can finally talk about the SATs 2022 maths papers in detail. Here, we join our popular author, Sophie Bartlett, as she takes us through a question level analysis of this year’s papers, questions and domain coverage.

Before we kick things off, it’s worth mentioning that the papers we’re about to explore are actually the postponed 2020 papers. This means no allowances for Covid gaps, unlike the GCSE maths papers.

And how have we created this blog? Well, Sophie has painstakingly analysed and pulled together the actual SATs paper questions and data from this year (and previous years!), as well as thoughts from the social media community along with her own impressions as a Year 6 teacher.

We’ll start with some general points, and then drill down into individual papers and questions. More of the examples are drawn from the Reasoning paper as that’s where the examiners excel at finding ways to concoct a question.

Level of difficulty and cognitive demand

Before we dive into the general picture for SATs 2022, let’s look back at Third Space Learning’s observations from the last couple of SATs seasons.

KS2 SATs 2018: Maths Papers Question Breakdown
“The level of difficulty has remained fairly uniform over the past few years… the last 3 questions on each of the KS2 SATs 2018 Reasoning papers continue to be the most challenging… The visualisation aspect of the cognitive domain was tested more frequently this year than in previous years”

KS2 SATS 2019: Maths Papers Question Breakdown
“The papers seemed to have ‘cliff edges’ in difficulty… The trickier questions in both 2018 and 2019 meant that children needed to be resilient and creative mathematicians to really succeed in the reasoning papers… The overall cognitive complexity of questions was higher than previous years… The level of spatial awareness and processing required was also high”

Mixed response to the level of difficulty and cognitive demand

From discussions with colleagues and perusing reactions on social media, Year 6 teachers’ general impression was that the cognitive demand was quite high across these sets of papers.

However, many people also agreed that this was fair in regards to challenging those children who should be aiming for ‘Greater Depth’ in maths.

If you’ve also read Third Space Learning’s previous blog covering the maths SATs 2022 survey results, you will know that there were mixed reactions to this year’s set of papers.

Survey feedback covered a variety of interpretations, from difficult first questions and multi-step problems to content coverage in teaching v. Year SATs revision and the Covid context.

Whilst some people felt the maths SATs papers were fair…

… others disagreed.

A common complaint was the number of words and the complexity of the language in the maths reasoning KS2 papers. This was certainly a dominant theme from survey respondents too!

Oh, my word! 2022 was the least ‘wordy’ set of SATs papers

However, upon further analysis of the papers, this year’s set actually came out to be one the least ‘wordy’ overall! (And yes, I did check twice because I was so surprised…)

Perhaps people’s perception of the ‘wordiness’ of the papers was due to the complexity of the language and the maths ‘hiding’ behind it. The actual arithmetic required for most of the questions wasn’t too difficult, but this wasn’t often obvious. See Paper 2 Q17, worth 1 mark, as one example of this.

Paper 2, Q17
Maths SATs 2022 Question Breakdown: Staff Discussion Points

Maths SATs 2022 Question Breakdown: Staff Discussion Points

See the 15 lessons you should take from the 2022 KS2 SATs papers, including clues about what may come up in the 2023 papers to help you prepare!

Only one 3-mark question across all papers

Paper 3 Q20 (the only 3-mark question) was a notably difficult question.

Paper 3, Q20

Having to find the mean (not only with very high numbers but with a division that created a remainder) and then having to round their answer was rather tricky. There are clearly 3 distinct steps here but, on top of the lengthy mathematical processes, the word ‘decades’ also seemed to throw some children.

Q17 seemed to be the ‘cliff edge’ this year

Combining both the year group content domain and cognitive demand of each question, both reasoning papers seemed to step difficulty up at around Q17.

The question image tripped up some children on at least 2 examples

The fact that lots of children got into difficulties with these questions shows us that they need constant reminders to answer the question they’re being asked, not what they think is being asked.

In the first example (worth 2 marks), when shown a picture of a cuboid, children are likely to expect a volume question.

Paper 3, Q17

A cuboid presented in this way is likely to lead children to believe they would be finding the volume. I wonder how many Year 6s tried to multiply those three numbers together…

In the second example, as some teachers have since pointed out, the numbered labelling of the axes caused confusion when it came to the reflection of shapes.

The only position and direction question (Paper 2 Q25, worth 2 marks) caused a lot of controversy.

Paper 2, Q25
Tweet from sara h @lifeatthenest
Tweet from sara h @lifeatthenest

Reviewing the answer scheme for this question shows how easily children could have gotten confused. The reflection from A to B is misleading as it isn’t extremely clear that both triangles are one unit away from the y axis.

Paper 2, Q25

Allocation of 1 or 2 marks wasn’t entirely in line with expectations

Finally, another question which provoked a lot of discussion on social media was the last question of Paper 3.

Paper 3, Q21

Many people argued that this question was too cognitively demanding to only be worth one mark.

Firstly, the children had to work out not only which measurement was the width (the shortest side of the rectangle), but how to measure it (the distance between the x coordinates, so 2 units).

The question specifies that the length of each rectangle is three times the width, which would mean the length is 6 units. Now the width and length are known, the coordinates of P can be calculated by adding 2 onto the y coordinate of (-2, 8) and 6 onto the x coordinate of (0,1).

The proportion of questions testing Year 6 content has reduced

In the mark scheme, the content domain for each question is labelled. See below for an analysis of which questions were based on objectives from which year group’s curriculum.

Interestingly, a lot of the content tested here is from Year 5, a term of which this cohort would’ve been in lockdown i.e. homeschooling. It will be interesting to see if this has had any impact.

Further reading: 2016 Key Stage 2 Mathematics Test Framework

Although the papers are still weighted towards Year 6 maths content, in previous years, we have seen it be possible to ‘pass’ (or almost pass) without knowing the Year 6 maths curriculum at all. The scaled scores are yet to be released this year, but if the pass mark remains at a similar level (between 52-55%), then the same can be said for this year as the content from Years 3-5 is higher than ever before.

Remember, these papers were originally intended for 2020. Therefore, it could not be possible for the test writers to make any adjustments because of Covid ‘gaps’.

Question structures

Contexts for the questions seemed much more relatable

There has been criticism in previous years of the unfamiliar contexts used by the question setters. These provide an additional challenge for some children.

Apart from the occasional “when-else-would-I-encounter-this-but-a-SATs-paper” question (such as the straw cuboid question referred to above), most of the questions seemed to be based on relevant, and relatable, contexts this year!

Paper 2, Q13
Paper 3, Q5
Paper 3, Q7

Just like the old favourites in 2019, another “how much change” question appeared in Paper 3.

Paper 3, Q3

Question setters showed an impressive ability to over-complicate

Paper 3 Q12, worth 2 marks, was an unusual way of presenting what was essentially a basic mathematical procedure.

Paper 3, Q12

3-mark question included only right at the end of Paper 3

By now we know there will always be a 3-mark question. In this case, it was the penultimate question of Paper 3 (the ‘mean’ question discussed earlier).

How do you prepare children for a 3 mark question? My approach is to firstly check the children understand that the more marks a question is worth, the more steps it is likely to require. With a 3-mark question, it is probable that there will be at least 3 steps (sometimes 4). I encourage the children to show each step of their working clearly in the method box as each step alone may well be worth a mark!

KS2 SATs 2018: Maths Papers Question Breakdown
“The 3-mark question is here to stay”

KS2 SATS 2019: Maths Papers Question Breakdown
“The 3-mark question moved! As implied in the test framework, it is likely that a 3 mark question – a feature only introduced in the new style SATs – is likely to appear once each year in either Paper 2 or Paper 3. (Interestingly, in 2019 the 3-mark question came in Paper 3, rather than Paper 2 like it had in previous years)… The amount of work required for one or two marks was higher than previous years”

How to score marks on the Arithmetic paper

Most of this article has been looking at questions from the Reasoning paper as that’s where the structure of the question can be as complex as the maths required. 

However, given how many marks are likely to be required for a scaled score of 100, high marks scored on the Arithmetic paper can often carry a child through to the expected standard.

Detailed breakdown of topics required for SATs Arithmetic paper

Missing topics from this Year 6 arithmetic test that we can expect next year:

  • multiplying a fraction by a fraction;
  • multiplying a mixed number by an integer.

‘Answer = question’ is as important to recognise as ‘question = answer’

As in previous Arithmetic papers, the ‘answer’ box was presented before the equals sign as well as afterwards (children seem to often be exposed to the question format of question = answer). 

Paper 1, Q7
Paper 1, Q15

Questions of the same type increased in difficulty over the paper

Let’s see this in action in the table below!

All questions are from Paper 1

True maths fluency was required for Arithmetic as well as Reasoning

As expected, no change here – children who struggle with mathematical fluency would have found all the papers challenging.

In the Arithmetic paper, Question 34 also seemed to throw some children. Where children had systematically learnt how to subtract two mixed numbers, subtracting a mixed number from an integer separated those who truly understood the mathematical procedure involved.

Paper 1, Q34

If you’re looking to improve pupil maths fluency beyond SATs, why not try Third Space Learning’s most popular resource, Fluent in Five! This daily scheme helps to build arithmetic skills through regular daily practice.

Topic coverage across all 3 papers

What were Third Space Learning’s predictions from the last SATs season?

KS2 SATS 2019: Maths Papers Question Breakdown
“Some surprising areas returned (mean and volume – may be omitted next year)”

“We can make some predictions, and there is a strong chance that we will see the following types of questions next year:
– Calculating time durations/difference and/or interpreting clocks;
– More conversions of units of measure;
– Interpreting complex scales;
– Negative numbers (as this was only lightly tested this year);
– Estimation;
– Translations where co-ordinates and the translation only are given, without a grid;
– Calculating with unknown angles (using shape properties);
– We should also expect roman numerals to make a reappearance”

Summary of the missing content in SATs 2022

The content domains for each question are detailed on page 4 of the mark scheme. According to the listed domains, the following areas were missing from this year’s papers.

  • Number and place value: counting in multiples (N1) and number problems (N6)
  • Calculations (four operations): estimate, use inverses and check (C3)
  • Fractions, decimals and percentages: comparing and ordering fractions (F3); fractions/decimal/percentage equivalence (F11); and solve problems with percentages (F12) (don’t be misled by Paper 3 Q18 – this is actually a ratio question: using percentages for comparison (R2))
  • Ratio and proportion: scale factors (R3) and unequal sharing and grouping (R4)
  • Algebra: generate and describe linear number sequences (A3) and enumerate all possibilities of combinations of two variables (A5)
  • Measurement: estimate, measure and read scales (M2); telling time, ordering time, duration and units of time (M4 – Third Space Learning thought this may appear as it was missing from the 2019 paper); convert metric/imperial (M6); perimeter, area (M7); and volume (M8 – Third Space Learning predicted this would be omitted this year!)
  • Geometry – properties of shapes: describe properties and classify shapes (G2)

Some other notable, and more specific, omissions were Roman numerals (5N3b – not mentioned above as other objectives in content domain N3 were covered in this test) and drawing/measuring angles using a protractor (5G4c – again, not mentioned above as other objectives in content domain G4 were covered in this test).

After the 2019 SATs, Third Space Learning predicted these areas would appear – and they did.

  • More conversions of units of measure
Paper 2, Q5
  • Negative numbers (as this was only lightly tested in 2019)
Paper 3, Q6
  • Calculating with unknown angles (using shape properties)
Paper 2, Q24

Third Space Learning’s online tutors work to cover all elements of the KS2 curriculum, so if you would like to find out how they can help plug gaps in all of the areas above, get in touch with us today.

Content domain breakdown across all 3 papers shows a big emphasis on calculations

An updated comparison grid of the content domain coverage in all the maths SATs papers so far shows quite a hike in the proportion of calculations questions; this was really clear as there did seem to be a lot of multi-step four operations questions.

The topics of algebra, measurement, geometry (both shape and position & direction) and statistics had the least amount of representation in this year’s papers than they’ve ever had before.

Across Arithmetic and Reasoning
Tweet from sara h @lifeatthenest
Tweet from sara h @lifeatthenest

Are you there, Chen?

Since the introduction of the new curriculum, Year 6 teachers’ favourite, Chen, first made an appearance in the 2016 sample paper. He returned in 2017 and hasn’t appeared since… until now!

Paper 2, Q4

 However, this subtle reference to Chen did not please everyone…!

Final reflections on the return of SATs

After three years of reprieve, the ‘return’ of SATs may have come as a bit of a shock to us all.

Trying to fit the curriculum in (or not, in many people’s cases) before May proved even trickier when there were so many other gaps to plug. Whether the pass mark is lowered or not this year remains to be seen, and will be very telling…

Taking into account what was predicted for this year, and what was missing from this year, we could assume that a number of topics would be likely to appear in the 2023 SATs.

  • Estimation
  • Time
  • Drawing and/or measuring angles using a protractor

It will be interesting to see whether the high proportion of calculations questions is here to stay or whether the content domains are a little more evenly spread next year.

While we may all be ready to collectively sigh and think ‘thank goodness that’s over!’, please remember that maths learning does not stop at SATs!

For those of us that haven’t taught the entire curriculum yet, there is still much yet to cover. For those that managed to fit everything in before, now is the perfect time to consolidate and extend the children’s learning to make sure they are as fully prepared for secondary school maths as possible.

Asking secondary maths teachers what they wish Year 6 children would come to Year 7 confident in produces almost exactly the same answers every time; fluency in times tables and related division facts, four operations, multi-step word problems and fraction/decimal/percentage equivalence.

So keep it up, comrades… the end is nigh!

Further reading:

Do you have pupils who need extra support in maths?
Every week Third Space Learning’s maths specialist tutors support thousands of pupils across hundreds of schools with weekly online 1-to-1 lessons and maths interventions designed to plug gaps and boost progress.

Since 2013 we’ve helped over 110,000 primary and secondary school pupils become more confident, able mathematicians. Learn more or request a personalised quote for your school to speak to us about your school’s needs and how we can help.

Primary school tuition targeted to the needs of each child and closely following the National Curriculum.

Sophie Bartlett
Sophie Bartlett
Year 6 Teacher
Sophie teaches mixed age classes at a small school in central England. She is a self confessed grammar pedant and number nerd so we've welcomed her as a regular author and editor for Third Space Learning.
x
Maths SATs 2022 Question Breakdown: Staff Discussion Points

Maths SATs 2022 Question Breakdown: Staff Discussion Points

See the 15 lessons you should take from the 2022 KS2 SATs papers, including clues about what may come up in the 2023 papers to help you prepare!

Download Free Now!

Maths SATs 2022 Question Breakdown: Staff Discussion Points

Downloadable resource

See the 15 lessons you should take from the 2022 KS2 SATs papers, including clues about what may come up in the 2023 papers to help you prepare!

Download Free Now!