Cognitive Load Theory In The Elementary Classroom: How I Wish I’d Taught Math
Clare Sealy breaks down the essentials of cognitive load theory, an understanding of which underpins much of what we know from cognitive science can improve teaching and learning in school.
This article is part of a series published to help elementary school teachers and leaders implement some of the insights and teaching techniques derived from Craig Barton’s bestselling book How I Wish I’d Taught Maths. Links to the other 5 articles appear at the end.
- Craig Barton – The book behind the blog
- Systematic reflection on education research and cognitive science
- Craig’s findings from research: How students think and learn
- What is cognitive load?
Craig Barton – The book behind the blog
As an elementary school teacher, you might not have heard of Craig Barton. Craig Barton is a legend among math teachers in the UK and his insights could have real impact in elementary classrooms here in the US.
As well as being behind Diagnostic Questions, he also created the incredibly useful website, Mr Barton Maths and has a very well-regarded podcast, the Mr Barton Maths Podcast. And now he has written an amazing book – How I Wish I’d Taught Maths.
The intended audience for his book is UK high school math teachers, but almost all of it is directly applicable to the elementary math classroom.
While some of the examples Craig uses are more obviously from the UK high school curriculum, many involve fractions or percentages or geometry examples that might well be used in any 5th grade classroom.
Systematic reflection on education research and cognitive science
The examples he uses are not what’s important about this book. What makes it essential reading is the systematic way Craig reflects on how learning about educational research, and in particular cognitive science, revolutionized how he taught math.
Like many of us, Craig never really thought much about how children think and learn. It rarely features in initial teacher training or later professional development. He now realizes that lots of his most cherished assumptions about what made good math teaching were wrong.
In How I Wish I’d Taught Maths, Craig explains what cognitive science teaches us about how people learn and what the implications of that are for teaching math effectively.
All of this is completely transferable to an elementary school context.
In this series of blogs, I will be outlining what Craig learned from cognitive science and how it challenged his assumptions. I will also then share the teaching strategies he now uses, all of which you will find you can use teaching your elementary students math.
In this first introduction blog, I look particularly at cognitive load theory as this is essential to all his findings about teaching math.
Craig’s findings from research: How students think and learn
Cognitive scientist Daniel Willingham explains in Why Students Don’t Like School that knowing about the interplay between working memory and long-term memory is extremely useful when trying to teach anybody anything.
Working memory is where thinking actually happens
Working memory only has a very finite capacity; it can hold and process roughly only four different items at a time. In our ignorance of the limits of working memory, our teaching often overwhelms its capacity, expecting learners to think about far too many things all at once.
As a result of this overload, learning fails as the working memory simply cannot process so much information all at once, so ‘forgets’ some of it.
- What The Best Elementary Math Teachers Do: How You Can Learn From Them Fast
- Learning and Memory in The Classroom: What Teachers Should Know
- Teaching Low Ability Students Math “Are We Bottom Set?”
- Common core math examples: 8 strategies to release cognitive load
Use the long-term memory to store facts
However, there is a way to work around the limitations of working memory. This is where knowing about long term memory comes in. Unlike our working memories, our long-term memory has huge – almost infinite – capacity.
It is here that we store our knowledge of facts and procedures. This vast repository of information resides outside our conscious awareness, but can be summoned into our working memory when needed.
Long term memory therefore enables us to bypass the problems presented by our small working memories.
By stocking our long-term memories with knowledge in a well organized, easily retrievable way and making recall of key aspects automatic, we drastically cut down on the processing our poor, beleaguered working memories have to do.
This is especially important when teaching students topics like the multiplication with the standard algorithm method, which is made much simpler if one has the relevant multiplication facts stored in their long-term memory.
When we teach math (and anything else for that matter), we need to think about how we can ensure that what we teach makes the precarious journey successfully from short term memory to long-term memory. To do this, we have to be mindful of cognitive load.
What is cognitive load?
Cognitive load is the term used in cognitive science to describe how much working memory capacity a topic takes up, and has become a key phrase of educational psychology. Cognitive overload is what happens if too many demands are placed on working memory at once.
Cognitive load theory was developed in the 1980s based on a problem solving study conducted by educational psychologist, John Sweller. The theory suggests that any topic can apply three types of cognitive load onto our working memory – intrinsic cognitive load, extraneous cognitive load and germane cognitive load.
Intrinsic load is the mental effort the topic inherently takes; solving a complex equation is always more difficult than adding two numbers, for example. Extraneous load is the effort added onto a task by the way it is presented, and is what we should seek to reduce when teaching. Germane load is the effort we put into long term information processing – into schema acquisition for a topic when we have no prior knowledge of it.
Sweller argued that instructional design – developing learning tasks that are designed from the ground up to be engaging as well as instructive – could reduce extraneous load and free up processing capacity in learners considerably.
The theory has been further developed by researchers such as Paul Ayres, who developed the ‘split-attention effect’: the idea that when learners are required to process information from two different instructional materials at once (e.g. text and diagram), working memory load is increased considerably.
Cognitive load in an elementary math context
Look at children learning to use the vertical addition algorithm with the following example:
A child who has their number bonds stored in their long-term memory and knows that 5 + 7 = 12 can import that fact into their working memory without conscious effort.
None of that precious, finite capacity of working memory has to be wasted working out 5+7.
Whereas a child who does not know the answer automatically has to divert processing resources away from thinking about columns, value and regrouping, thinking instead about what 5+7 adds up to.
Their overloaded working memory can’t cope with this additional demand on top of everything else it is already thinking about, so it ‘forgets’ one of the important steps in the procedure. The child therefore gets the answer wrong.
Or even if the child doesn’t get the answer wrong, they do not learn how to use the vertical algorithm as a useful method they can generalize and transfer to other similar problems.
The right amount of cognitive load for learning in elementary math
The main focus of How I Wish I’d Taught Maths is how to create just the right amount of cognitive load so that teaching can be as effective as possible and about making sure knowledge makes it from the working memory to the long-term memory by cutting out anything that might cause cognitive overload and replacing them with better alternatives.
A good example of this can be found here in this blog post on how to teach telling the time, breaking it down to the simplest core elements.
Read more on cognitive load theory and the other cornerstones of evidence based teaching here:
- How To Learn Math
- Differentiation in the Classroom: The 8 Strategies That Will Support Every Student To Reach A Good Standard
- Metacognition in the Classroom: A 7-Step Practical Approach To Elementary Math Teaching
- Quality First Teaching Checklist Of Strategies That Work
Other articles in the How I Wish I’d Taught Elementary Math series
- Explicit Direct Instruction And Using Rosenshine Principles of Instruction (2)
- Focused Thinking And Goal Free Questions (3)
In the latter part of the book, Craig considers how teaching can facilitate effective remembering. Having explained strategies for making sure learning makes it from the working memory to the long-term memory, the focus now turns to helping students use what they know.
How each article is structured
In each of these blogs, I ‘translate’ what Craig is saying into more elementary math relevant terms and use more elementary math curriculum focused examples than he has used.
Each blog has a section highlighting elementary school math context. Here I give practical examples of how Craig’s insights might be deployed in an elementary classroom, rather than directly explaining what he says himself in his book.
Where I need to use the first person in these ‘translated’ sections, I have used ‘she’ rather than ‘he’ as a way of emphasizing that this is my interpretation of Craig’s work, rather than a summary of his own words or examples.
It is not intended as a slight on male elementary teachers! The references for the research Craig has used that I have mentioned are listed at the end of each blog under the title Sources of Inspiration.
Sources of Inspiration
- Barton C. (2018), How I Wish I’d Taught Maths
- Sweller, J (June 1988). “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning” (PDF)
- Ayres P., Cierniak G. (2012) Split-Attention Effect. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA
- Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
Do you have students who need extra support in math?
Give your students more opportunities to consolidate learning and practice skills through personalized math tutoring with their own dedicated online math tutor.
Each student receives differentiated instruction designed to close their individual learning gaps, and scaffolded learning ensures every student learns at the right pace. Lessons are aligned with your state’s standards and assessments, plus you’ll receive regular reports every step of the way.
Personalized one-on-one math tutoring programs are available for:
– 2nd grade tutoring
– 3rd grade tutoring
– 4th grade tutoring
– 5th grade tutoring
– 6th grade tutoring
– 7th grade tutoring
– 8th grade tutoring
Why not learn more about how it works?
The content in this article was originally written by primary headteacher Clare Sealy and has since been revised and adapted for US schools by elementary math teacher Christi Kulesza.